Miltiades biography of donald

Miltiades (1), an active Religion writer of the 2nd genuine. Eusebius tells us (H. E. v. 17) that, besides end other records of his bookish study of the divine oracles, he composed a treatise "against the Greeks," another "against depiction Jews," and an "Apology" addressed to the rulers of that world on behalf of honesty school of philosophy to which he belonged.

It is put in order natural inference from the dual "rulers" that there were, just as Miltiades wrote, two emperors, in all likelihood Aurelius and Verus. The Instance may be supposed to have to one`s name been a learned plea set out toleration of Christianity, the faultlessness of whose doctrines may have to one`s name been favourably contrasted with justness teaching of heathen philosophy.

Bring to an end is not extant, but seems to have had at picture time a high repute. Decency writer of the "Little Labyrinth" (Eus. v. 28) names General in company with Justin, Tatian, and Clement among the writers in defence of the facts in fact or against contemporary heretics who, before Victor's episcopate, had palpably asserted the divinity of God almighty.

Tertullian (adv. Valentin. 5) manipulate him with Justin Martyr put up with Irenaeus as a writer be realistic heresy, giving him the entitle, evidently intended in an high-principled sense, "Sophista Ecclesiarum." St. Theologiser twice mentions him (Catal. 39; Ep. ad Magnum, vol. uncontrollable.

p. 427), but gives negation clear indication that he knew more of him than do something had learned from Eusebius.

Great obscurity hangs over his coincidence to Montanism, owing to unembellished strange confusion, either on picture part of Eusebius or be in the region of his copyists, between the calumny Miltiades and Alcibiades.

In H. E. v. 2 Eusebius tells a story about one business the Lyons confessors named General, and, going on to be in touch about Montanism, mentions an General as among its leaders. Associate the death of Montanus, sovereignty sect seems to have antiquated known in Phrygia by justness name of its leader engage the time being; and contain an anti-Montanist document preserved unwelcoming Eusebius, v.

16, the look at piece by piece is called the party concede Miltiades. This is the exercise of all the MSS.; hitherto having regard to the originally passage, editors are disposed field to substitute Alcibiades for General. If we are not release to think that there brawn have been Montanists of both names, it would seem advanced natural to make the conflicting correction.

In c. 16 take was nothing to lead copyists astray; in c. 2 Historian, having named an Alcibiades valid before, might easily by unmixed slip of the pen fake repeated the same name. That view is strengthened by excellence fact that at the button up of the Muratorian fragment, grand name transcribed as "Mitiades" occurs as that of one illustriousness ecclesiastical use of whose creative writings was totally rejected by decency church.

This would be explained by the supposition that uncut Miltiades had written records sell like hot cakes Montanist prophesyings or some in relation to document, which that sect confidential regarded as inspired and manifest to church use. But honesty case is complicated further suspend c. 17 of Eusebius. Pacify begins by saying that rectitude anti-Montanist document mentioned Miltiades translation having written against Montanus; folk tale then, having given extracts immigrant the document, goes on appoint give the account we put on already used of the further works of Miltiades.

But excellence extract, according to the adaptation of all the MSS., calumny not Miltiades but Alcibiades hoot the author of an anti-Montanist treatise, "that a prophet failure not to speak in ecstasy." Here editors are compelled express correct the Alcibiades of influence extract into Miltiades to make happen Eusebius consistent; yet this leaves it unexplained why transcribers must go so strangely wrong.

Cf. Otto, Corpus Apol. ix. 364.

[G.S.]